It's hard to be a leader nowadays. For one thing, it's hard to do the part that you were elected to do. You were voted, Mr. OKT, to speak up on behalf of your group: And you did, just a wee bit, in recent days, in response to Mr. Ham's statement. Mr. H had said that Mr. H's ilk would like to milk the till for another decade and a half.
Mr. OKT, you must remember that Mr. H belongs to the group of No Objections. You and your ilk, on the other hand, belong to the Money Creation Agency. The group of No Objections looks upon your group as a vehicle for continued happiness...
Mr. H has said that you should have spoken to him before PRESS-ing ahead with your response. But -- who is Mr. H? Does he sit on the top of his group? NO, he is not the supreme leader. But -- you, Mr. OKT, sit on the top of your group! Why should you have to consult with Mr. H before commenting on behalf of your group?
Should not Mr. H's supreme leader consulted you, before or even after the No Objections annual meeting? The argument may be that your Money Creation Agency is smaller than the No Objections group!
If the "size" argument is to hold water, Mr. OKT, then think, for one second! The "May I Come" group is smaller than the Money Creation Agency. Who should they consult with before PRESS-ing ahead to reply the No Objection group? A lesser official than Mr. H perhaps? Maybe his office boy?
What about the Movement group, which is smaller than the "May I Come" group? I fear they need consult with someone even lower ranking than that. They need to consult with the washerwoman before PRESS-ing ahead with any statements!
The way things work out, it won't be good. The allegation that the non-B's have a bigger cut of the cake must be supported by full and frank disclosure. In the face of full statistics, perhaps it shall be shown that the B's have it better than the non-B's. How is it that Dr. M can call for a full disclosure of AP holders, and command for the release of lists of previous years, and yet we cannot get the same full and frank disclosure for the No Equality Policy?
Mr. OKT, perhaps it would be prudent to check out what our Department of Statistics is doing for the nation. Click on the link below:
http://www.statistics.gov.my/
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
ever so wistful, my pretty lady sighs. once she was more blissful, then she became my wife. gone were the days when she could frolic free. l...
-
(verse) never underestimate the damage from a woman's hate if you do -- woe to you! never try to brush aside the contributions of a wife...
-
Quick Note: Absalom was a son of King David. This piece was based on his life as portrayed in the Bible. Absalom was David's fa... -
'Twas a fearsome movie with kicks aplenty. Not least was the brutal body count: First, the old warlord (Kun), followed by the old master...
-
Golden Rules of Business Success The Twelve Golden Rules are as follows: Ability to know people's character. You must perceive ...
-
Happy Birthday! said the children, to their beloved teacher, And tears streamed down their cheeks As they danced and sang for her. The last ...
-
I found the following piece of news at Building.co.uk, to be quite interesting. It brings to mind the whole issue of "foreseeability...
-
their numbers are legion all over the region, their leader's charm a spreading contagion strangling the youths: the roots of our nation....
-
Recently, I attended the National Unity Forum, organised by Jabatan Perpaduan Negara (Prime Minister's Department). Mr. Philip Koh spoke...
-
In a recent case, Balakrishnan Devaraj v Patwant Singh Niranjan Singh & Anor [2005] 4 CLJ 210, a tout tried to enforce an agreement aga...
Giveaway of the Day
No comments:
Post a Comment