While browsing through the statue, I found some interesting things in the "Births" section of the BIRTHS AND DEATHS REGISTRATION ACT 1957 (REVISED 1983)/ ACT 299.
Interesting Provision #1
16. Registration of objectionable or undesirable names.
Where it appears to the Registrar that the name of a child sought to be entered in a register of births is objectionable or undesirable he shall refer the matter to the Registrar-General and the Registrar-General may cause such name to be registered or not to be registered as he shall deem fit.
The interesting part of this section is that the Registrar-General may object to the name of the child from being registered. Who is he to object? Under the Trademarks Act, the Registrar of Trademarks may refuse to register a Chinese name (Chinese characters) unless he is satisfied as to the meaning of the name. Hence, you have to give a certified translation.... Easy money for those translators, indeed.
In any case it might be instructive to look at section 7(3) as follows:
7. Particulars of births to be registered.
(1) Subject to the provisions of this Part, the birth of every child born in Malaysia shall be registered by the Registrar for the registration area in which the child was born by entering in a register in duplicate in manner prescribed such particulars concerning the birth as may be prescribed; and different registers shall be used and different particulars may be prescribed for live-births and still-births respectively:
Provided that, where a living child is found exposed and no information as to the place of birth is available, the birth shall be registered by the Registrar for the registration area in which the child is found.
(2) The following persons shall be qualified to give information concerning a birth, that is to say-
(a) the father of the child;
(b) the mother of the child;
(c) the occupier of the house in which the child was to the knowledge of that occupier born;
(d) any person present at the birth; and
(e) any person having charge of the child.
(3) In the case of a child of the Chinese race the Registrar may, after entering in the register the prescribed particulars of such child, permit a qualified informant to insert in such manner as may be prescribed the name of such child and the name of the father and mother of such child in Chinese characters.
The second interesting provision is as follows.
13. Provisions as to father of illegitimate child.
Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this Act, in the case of an illegitimate child, no person shall as father of the child be required to give information concerning the birth of the child, and the Registrar shall not enter in the register the name of any person as father of the child except at the joint request of the mother and the person acknowledging himself to be the father of the child, and that person shall in that case sign the register together with the mother.
Now, the father is not required to put his name down as the father if the child is illegitimate. However there seems to be some conflict of provision:
13A. Surname of child.
(1) The surname, if any, to be entered in respect of a legitimate child shall ordinarily be the surname, if any, of the father.
(2) The surname, if any, to be entered in respect of an illegitimate child may where the mother is the informant and volunteers the information, be the surname of the mother; provided that where the person acknowledging himself to be the father of the child in accordance with the provisions of section 13 request so, the surname may be the surname of that person.
It seems that the child will get the mother's surname unless the dad is put down in the register as the dad. Unless and until that happens then the child's surname shall not follow that of the father. So, the question for all those aspiring Romeo's out there is whether they wish their offspring to have their surname, or not? If not, then they can rest assured that they need not be registered as the father.
Incidentally, the Act applies to all Malaysians, whether they are Muslim or otherwise. Interesting, the way law works, when you look at it in perspective ;-)
About Me
Popular Posts
-
A little luxury car. There's a little logo on the boot that says "smart". Is it really smart? It's a failure. It seats two...
-
nice concept of a postcard. http://mocoloco.com/archives/000383.php (thanks waee for link.) 2003 convention photos - russian event. http://w...
-
He bought it wrongly And feels quite strongly That there is no wrong if He auctions off his Router for ADSL Modem. He promises freedo...
-
there is a lovely glowing in the orange purpled sky and the whole world has been waiting for this one moment when the firecrackers spurt...
-
this day has finally come. the morning when i wake up and look outside my window... and see cameron highlands! gosh, it's hazy. i can ev...
-
my car is coming to a decade old soon. not that it's not doing its job well. it's just that it's been a little long. and the wea...
-
Interesting. What a way to promote a gym business! Well, click on this link to go to the original page. The CNergy Big Splash Party is on t...
-
found this link. rather interesting. will pursue it someday. http://guide.asiadragons.com/Shopping/Auction/ Top 20 auction sites wor...
-
small form factor PC, is what i will acquire to meet the growing demands of what my dad requires email for networking, internet for his su...
-
our future, imposing, wouldst make us bow: but we, defiant, must show them how a backward spelt "pen" can be re-written if true th...
Blog Archive
Blogs I read (when I have time)
-
Bad Clients1 month ago
-
April Musings 20251 year ago
-
A Few Words On Healthcare1 year ago
-
The paradox of insular language2 years ago
-
The End of Blogging (for Me)3 years ago
-
The Only Person Fit to Be Mayor of NYC4 years ago
-
-
